May 18, 2022

Leaders respond to Kan. court decision to uphold congressional map

Posted May 18, 2022 10:00 PM
U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids
U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids

 TOPEKA —Kansas Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Republican redistricting law that improves the GOP's chances of flipping the state's only congressional seat held by a Democrat.

 Democrats argued that the map was drawn to help Republicans unseat Democratic U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids in the 3rd District in the Kansas City area, while Republicans called it a fair map.

In a statement from her office Davids said, “From rushed hearings to backroom deals for votes, the redistricting process did not instill a sense of transparency or confidence in the people of Kansas. I hope that although many feel their voice was not heard, they do not feel as though their voice does not matter.

I look forward to introducing myself to the new voters in the Third District, continuing my work to find common ground and tackle the everyday issues facing our community, and showing all Kansans that to me, their voice matters."

Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt argued the case before the Kansas Supreme Court  -photo by Thad Allton for Kansas Reflector
Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt argued the case before the Kansas Supreme Court  -photo by Thad Allton for Kansas Reflector

Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt who is also running for governor,  praised the court for quick action on the case. "I am grateful for the expeditious manner in which the court announced the outcome of the cases, and this year’s candidate filings and election preparations can now proceed.”

“The decisions confirm that the legislative and congressional reapportionments of Kansas enacted by the Legislature this year are constitutionally sound. We have successfully defended every Kansan’s right to equal protection of the law in exercising their right to vote, as well as the public’s right to establish new districts through their elected representatives.

"It is regrettable that Kansas taxpayers have had to bear the unnecessary cost of successfully defending the duly enacted congressional reapportionment against multiple lawsuits backed by out-of-state activists."